Kant’s Categorical Imperatives Essay -- Kants Moral Philosophy

In ramble to evaluate whether ones actions are moral, we use many moral dilemmas. One of them is Kants flavourless coercive. This rise presents Kants project of categoric imperative. Then, I will explain that rulers should appeal to Kants categorical imperative when making foreign policy decision. In order to support my point of view, I will give importance to the reasons of why rulers appeal to categorical imperative when making foreign policy, so I set out two reasons for this. One of them is that states depend on each other in economically and politically. Thus, in order to provide this stability which means that continue to tolerate among other states, states should act through the principles of categorical imperative which are universally valid, good intention and never using people or other states as means to end. The guerrilla reason is that if rulers appeal to categorical imperative when making foreign policy decisions, the world empennage be more peaceful. Sin ce, wars and conflicts which are caused by bad intention, using other people or states as means for gaining advantages which are not universally valid can be hindered by categorical imperatives. Finally, I will conclude that the Kants categorical imperatives are still valid and necessary when rulers are making foreign policy decisions. If we explain before long Kants categorical imperative, there are basically three principles that represent it. These are universal law, ends as a means and the importance of intention in get bying of human behaviour. Firstly, according to Kant, ones action should be universally valid. Universal validity means that people should think behaviours and they need to judge their stimulate behaviours or actions are morally acceptable or not. When you think of your behaviour, if you decide that everyone acts in the same way with me, then the action become universal and moral. The second principle of categorical imperative is that people must respect other s and never use them for achieving some goals. Lastly, the third but the roughly important criterion of categorical imperative is maxim, which means intention. Moral value is determined by the intention of people, which is called general maxim. If your intention is good, then your action is moral. The consequences of your action are not important, the most important thing is your intention. For this reason, being moral in... ... a means to their ends. As a result of this kind of action, war between states is inevitable. It is because when one state can act in that way toward others then, other states also act in similar way. For this reason, their interests can be probably conflicted and chaos in world governance can arise. However, if states take into account the principles of categorical imperative, there will be probably no conflict or chaos in the world politics.In conclusion, when the principles of categorical imperative are concerned, we easily realise that they depend on e ach other and they help us to evaluate the actions, which are moral. These principles of categorical imperative have the same goal that is being moral. For to be moral, the actions should be universal and should not have the aim of using others in order to gain advantages. If rulers conduct through the principles of categorical imperative then, it is obvious that the world would be more peaceful and fair. However, these obligations are not put into practise in todays world politics. But, it is enough to know that categorical imperative is still valid and is necessary to apply to todays conditions of foreign policy.